GLXU vs. NVDQ
GLXU (T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLXU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. GLXU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDQ.
Performance
GLXU vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLXU achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's -28.10% return.
GLXU
- 1D
- -17.15%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -21.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDQ
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 11.23%
- YTD
- -28.10%
- 6M
- -26.43%
- 1Y
- -61.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLXU vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF | -4.97% | -55.12% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -28.10% | -17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLXU and NVDQ is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLXU vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank
GLXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDQ
GLXU vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLXU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLXU vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLXU drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXU and NVDQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLXU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.66% | -99.45% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.89% | -99.27% | +20.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.88% | -88.31% | +30.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.99% | — |
Volatility
GLXU vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLXU | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 53.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 182.06% | 70.45% | +111.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 182.06% | 95.37% | +86.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.06% | 95.37% | +86.69% |
GLXU vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLXU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLXU vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison
GLXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than NVDQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF | 7.85% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.36% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLXU and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GLXU.
GLXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.85%, compared with 0.36% for NVDQ.
GLXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GLXU and 1.05% for NVDQ.
Find the right allocation for GLXU and NVDQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer