PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLRY vs. RISN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLRY vs. RISN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than RISN's 6.51% return.


GLRY

1D
0.36%
1M
2.25%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.71%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*

RISN

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.49%
YTD
6.51%
6M
4.83%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRY vs. RISN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
17.07%16.50%16.59%19.58%-22.50%15.97%4.13%
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
6.51%10.83%7.61%10.29%-18.06%22.47%0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRY and RISN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.67

The correlation between GLRY and RISN shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLRY vs. RISN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLRY
RISN

Technology

32.3%
18.6%

Industrials

24.6%
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
10.9%

Financial Services

10.2%
22.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
4.5%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Energy

2.5%
6.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.7%

Communication Services

1.6%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
2.6%

Technology

GLRY
32.3%
RISN
18.6%

Industrials

GLRY
24.6%
RISN
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GLRY
11.9%
RISN
10.9%

Financial Services

GLRY
10.2%
RISN
22.2%

Healthcare

GLRY
8.1%
RISN
4.5%

Utilities

GLRY
3.0%
RISN

-

Real Estate

GLRY
2.6%
RISN

-

Energy

GLRY
2.5%
RISN
6.8%

Basic Materials

GLRY
1.8%
RISN
2.7%

Communication Services

GLRY
1.6%
RISN
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

GLRY
1.4%
RISN
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLRY vs. RISN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRY
GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

RISN
RISN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRY vs. RISN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLRYRISNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.11

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

7.14

+2.34

GLRY vs. RISN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRY Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RISN Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRY and RISN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLRYRISNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.32

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.41

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.65

-0.13

Drawdowns

GLRY vs. RISN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than RISN's maximum drawdown of -21.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and RISN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLRYRISNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-21.88%

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-7.42%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.50%

-16.37%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.63%

-21.88%

-12.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.04%

-7.52%

-8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.19%

+0.94%

Volatility

GLRY vs. RISN - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) at 3.79%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLRYRISNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.79%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

9.46%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

11.90%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

11.18%

+8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

11.34%

+10.07%

GLRY vs. RISN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RISN's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLRY vs. RISN - Dividend Comparison

GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than RISN's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
0.24%0.34%0.52%1.07%1.04%4.00%0.00%
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
1.03%0.98%1.39%2.05%1.27%9.74%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLRY and RISN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLRY has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to RISN (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs RISN's -21.88%.

On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.81% vs 4.57% for RISN. On fees, RISN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, RISN has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.81% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RISN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.

RISN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.

GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while RISN is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.82% for RISN.

GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLRY and RISN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer