GLRY vs. IJK
GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire, while IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. GLRY is actively managed, while IJK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRY returned 8.81%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for IJK. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for IJK.
Performance
GLRY vs. IJK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly lower than IJK's 19.01% return.
GLRY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 6M
- 15.71%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
IJK
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- 29.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
GLRY vs. IJK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 17.07% | 16.50% | 16.59% | 19.58% | -22.50% | 15.97% | 4.13% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 19.01% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRY and IJK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GLRY and IJK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLRY vs. IJK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRY
IJK
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
GLRY
IJK
Industrials
GLRY
IJK
Consumer Cyclical
GLRY
IJK
Financial Services
GLRY
IJK
Healthcare
GLRY
IJK
Utilities
GLRY
IJK
Real Estate
GLRY
IJK
Energy
GLRY
IJK
Basic Materials
GLRY
IJK
Communication Services
GLRY
IJK
Consumer Defensive
GLRY
IJK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRY vs. IJK — Risk / Return Rank
GLRY
IJK
GLRY vs. IJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRY | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 3.02 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 11.93 | -2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRY | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.76 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.42 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.37 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
GLRY vs. IJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum IJK drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and IJK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRY | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -54.47% | +13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -9.92% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -25.63% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.63% | -29.24% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.04% | -10.80% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.51% | +0.62% |
Volatility
GLRY vs. IJK - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) at 5.15%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRY | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 5.15% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | 13.16% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 17.03% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 20.69% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.06% | +0.35% |
GLRY vs. IJK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IJK's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRY vs. IJK - Dividend Comparison
GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than IJK's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRY and IJK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLRY has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to IJK (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs IJK's -54.47%.
On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.81% vs 8.57% for IJK. On fees, IJK is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, IJK has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.81% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJK is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.
IJK has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.
GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while IJK is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.17% for IJK.
IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLRY and IJK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer