PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLRE.L vs. RWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than RWO's 9.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L has underperformed RWO with an annualized return of 3.13%, while RWO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.58% annualized return.


GLRE.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.73%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
3.13%

RWO

1D
1.12%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
9.15%
6M
8.96%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
6.61%9.96%-0.53%11.24%-25.26%30.62%-10.88%20.54%-6.34%9.87%
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
9.15%8.87%1.76%10.91%-25.11%31.03%-10.44%21.17%-6.04%7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRE.L and RWO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012

0.63

The correlation between GLRE.L and RWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLRE.L
RWO

Real Estate

99.9%
89.3%

Industrials

0.0%
0.2%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.8%

Utilities

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Technology

-

0.7%

Real Estate

GLRE.L
99.9%
RWO
89.3%

Industrials

GLRE.L
0.0%
RWO
0.2%

Financial Services

GLRE.L
0.0%
RWO
0.8%

Utilities

GLRE.L
0.0%
RWO
0.0%

Basic Materials

GLRE.L

-

RWO

-

Communication Services

GLRE.L

-

RWO

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLRE.L

-

RWO
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

GLRE.L

-

RWO

-

Energy

GLRE.L

-

RWO
0.3%

Healthcare

GLRE.L

-

RWO
0.4%

Technology

GLRE.L

-

RWO
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLRE.L vs. RWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRE.L
GLRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

RWO
RWO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLRE.LRWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

5.68

-0.88

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the RWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRE.L and RWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLRE.LRWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.10

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.13

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.20

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.17

+0.10

Drawdowns

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, smaller than the maximum RWO drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and RWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLRE.LRWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.26%

-67.69%

+24.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-9.51%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-17.66%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-32.85%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.26%

-43.27%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-2.14%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-12.68%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.45%

+0.06%

Volatility

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) is 3.84%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that GLRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLRE.LRWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

4.06%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

9.39%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

12.72%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

17.04%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

18.21%

-0.54%

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RWO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLRE.L vs. RWO - Dividend Comparison

GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than RWO's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLRE.L
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
2.58%2.72%2.79%2.62%2.85%1.82%2.51%3.16%3.54%3.86%2.66%2.15%
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
3.31%3.62%3.68%3.53%3.69%2.79%3.25%3.97%3.90%3.26%3.77%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLRE.L and RWO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLRE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLRE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.

GLRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.50% for RWO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and RWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer