GLRE.L vs. RWO
GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds from State Street - GLRE.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while RWO tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L returned 3.13%/yr vs 3.58%/yr for RWO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RWO.
Performance
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than RWO's 9.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L has underperformed RWO with an annualized return of 3.13%, while RWO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.58% annualized return.
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
RWO
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 13.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.58%
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.61% | 9.96% | -0.53% | 11.24% | -25.26% | 30.62% | -10.88% | 20.54% | -6.34% | 9.87% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 9.15% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRE.L and RWO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2012 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GLRE.L and RWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRE.L
RWO
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
GLRE.L
RWO
Industrials
GLRE.L
RWO
Financial Services
GLRE.L
RWO
Utilities
GLRE.L
RWO
Basic Materials
GLRE.L
-
RWO
-
Communication Services
GLRE.L
-
RWO
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLRE.L
-
RWO
Consumer Defensive
GLRE.L
-
RWO
-
Energy
GLRE.L
-
RWO
Healthcare
GLRE.L
-
RWO
Technology
GLRE.L
-
RWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRE.L vs. RWO — Risk / Return Rank
GLRE.L
RWO
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRE.L | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.47 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 5.68 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRE.L | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.10 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.13 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.20 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.17 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, smaller than the maximum RWO drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and RWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRE.L | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -67.69% | +24.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -9.51% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -17.66% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -32.85% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.26% | -43.27% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -2.14% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -12.68% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.45% | +0.06% |
Volatility
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) is 3.84%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that GLRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRE.L | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 4.06% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 9.39% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 12.72% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 17.04% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 18.21% | -0.54% |
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RWO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRE.L vs. RWO - Dividend Comparison
GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than RWO's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.31% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRE.L and RWO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLRE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLRE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.
GLRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRE.L and 0.50% for RWO.
Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and RWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer