GLRE.L vs. IGSU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L).
GLRE.L and IGSU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLRE.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on Oct 23, 2012. IGSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. Both GLRE.L and IGSU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLRE.L or IGSU.L.
Key characteristics
| GLRE.L | IGSU.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -5.77% | 6.75% |
| 1Y Return | 3.35% | 22.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.29% | 7.03% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.47% | 12.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.56% | 8.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.23 | 1.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.43% | 11.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.26% | -33.33% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.04% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRE.L and IGSU.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GLRE.L vs. IGSU.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly lower than IGSU.L's 6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L has underperformed IGSU.L with an annualized return of 2.56%, while IGSU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLRE.L vs. IGSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IGSU.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLRE.L vs. IGSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLRE.L vs. IGSU.L - Dividend Comparison
GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while IGSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.85% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.88% | 2.68% | 2.14% | 2.27% | 2.57% |
IGSU.L iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLRE.L vs. IGSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than IGSU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and IGSU.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLRE.L vs. IGSU.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.