GLRE.L vs. REGL
GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRE.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L returned 3.13%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for REGL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRE.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than REGL's 4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRE.L has underperformed REGL with an annualized return of 3.13%, while REGL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
REGL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 10.93%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.61% | 9.96% | -0.53% | 11.24% | -25.26% | 30.62% | -10.88% | 20.54% | -6.34% | 9.87% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.58% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 20.38% | 7.50% | 18.79% | -3.25% | 10.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRE.L and REGL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015 | 0.43 |
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRE.L
REGL
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
GLRE.L
REGL
Industrials
GLRE.L
REGL
Financial Services
GLRE.L
REGL
Utilities
GLRE.L
REGL
Basic Materials
GLRE.L
-
REGL
Communication Services
GLRE.L
-
REGL
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLRE.L
-
REGL
Consumer Defensive
GLRE.L
-
REGL
Energy
GLRE.L
-
REGL
Healthcare
GLRE.L
-
REGL
Technology
GLRE.L
-
REGL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRE.L vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank
GLRE.L
REGL
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRE.L | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 3.61 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRE.L | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.83 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.38 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.50 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.53 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than REGL's maximum drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRE.L and REGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRE.L | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.26% | -36.37% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -9.67% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -16.96% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -16.96% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.26% | -36.37% | -6.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -5.27% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -4.08% | -6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 3.04% | -0.53% |
Volatility
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 3.63%. This indicates that GLRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRE.L | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 3.63% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 9.20% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 13.20% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 16.11% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 18.33% | -0.66% |
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLRE.L and REGL have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
GLRE.L vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison
GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than REGL's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.22% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRE.L and REGL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLRE.L and REGL have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
GLRE.L is categorized as REIT, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. GLRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares.
Find the right allocation for GLRE.L and REGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer