PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLQ vs. GWOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLQ achieves a 18.38% return, which is significantly higher than GWOAX's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GLQ has underperformed GWOAX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while GWOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


GLQ

1D
0.23%
1M
6.91%
YTD
18.38%
6M
18.02%
1Y
41.19%
3Y*
26.70%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
9.63%

GWOAX

1D
0.59%
1M
5.69%
YTD
16.38%
6M
18.34%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
18.38%28.55%25.41%2.67%-42.31%6.48%28.28%23.94%-9.74%32.83%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
16.38%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GLQ and GWOAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.66

The correlation between GLQ and GWOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLQ vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLQ
GLQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLQGWOAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.91

3.07

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.91

4.23

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.56

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

4.33

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.69

17.30

-0.60

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the GWOAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLQ and GWOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLQGWOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

3.07

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.72

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.74

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.47

-0.19

Drawdowns

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLQ drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than GWOAX's maximum drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLQ and GWOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLQGWOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.45%

-49.84%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.61%

-8.78%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-16.11%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.47%

-26.21%

-31.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.47%

-35.28%

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

0.00%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.30%

-9.00%

-8.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.19%

+0.39%

Volatility

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison

Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) at 3.36%. This indicates that GLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLQGWOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.36%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

9.48%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.27%

12.39%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

15.22%

+5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

16.50%

+5.49%

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLQ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLQ vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison

GLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than GWOAX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
9.45%10.18%10.86%12.13%21.42%12.25%9.66%10.96%13.68%9.63%11.68%11.01%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
3.83%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLQ and GWOAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLQ has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to GWOAX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLQ dropped -64.45% vs GWOAX's -49.84%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLQ and GWOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer