PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLO having a 9.94% return and VOO slightly higher at 10.16%. Over the past 10 years, GLO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.96%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


GLO

1D
0.34%
1M
-4.02%
6M
4.18%
YTD
9.94%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
-2.97%
10Y*
6.96%
ALL TIME*
4.41%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$523.02K$713.03K$853.86K
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

GLO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLO
Clough Global Opportunities Fund
9.94%23.76%21.83%4.69%-44.50%6.31%32.98%28.24%-15.41%34.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GLO and VOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.69

The correlation between GLO and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLO
GLO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.21

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

9.44

-2.27

GLO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLO drawdown since its inception was -60.53%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.53%

-33.99%

-26.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-8.90%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.11%

-18.69%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.59%

-24.52%

-34.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.59%

-33.99%

-24.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.22%

-1.38%

-18.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-3.67%

-13.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.08%

+0.72%

Volatility

GLO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that GLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.54%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

10.10%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.01%

12.82%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

16.93%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

18.01%

+3.31%

Dividends

GLO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.73%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLO
Clough Global Opportunities Fund
10.73%10.62%11.25%12.33%22.32%12.26%9.69%11.12%14.48%10.11%12.63%11.49%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLO and VOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLO has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLO dropped -60.53% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer