GLO vs. PDI
Compare and contrast key facts about Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI).
Performance
GLO vs. PDI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLO vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLO Clough Global Opportunities Fund | 1.12% | 23.76% | 21.83% | 4.69% | -44.50% | 6.31% | 32.98% | 28.24% | -15.41% | 34.87% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 0.17% | 11.03% | 17.18% | 11.99% | -16.99% | 7.81% | -9.96% | 22.23% | 7.35% | 18.59% |
Fundamentals
GLO:
$238.21M
PDI:
$7.06B
GLO:
$2.57
PDI:
$3.86
GLO:
2.17
PDI:
4.44
GLO:
0.05
PDI:
0.07
GLO:
4.84
PDI:
3.29
GLO:
0.85
PDI:
0.95
GLO:
$49.18M
PDI:
$2.03B
GLO:
$0.00
PDI:
$1.51B
GLO:
$116.54M
PDI:
$2.09B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLO achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GLO has underperformed PDI with an annualized return of 6.50%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
GLO
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -6.91%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 27.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
PDI
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- -7.15%
- 1Y
- -0.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLO vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank
GLO
PDI
GLO vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLO | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | -0.02 | +1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 0.09 | +2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.02 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | -0.01 | +2.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | -0.03 | +10.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLO | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | -0.02 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.23 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.43 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.59 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLO and PDI is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLO vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison
GLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, less than PDI's 15.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLO Clough Global Opportunities Fund | 10.99% | 10.62% | 11.25% | 12.33% | 22.32% | 12.26% | 9.69% | 11.12% | 14.48% | 10.11% | 12.63% | 11.49% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 15.46% | 14.94% | 14.43% | 14.74% | 17.84% | 10.21% | 10.01% | 9.45% | 10.78% | 8.81% | 14.79% | 18.70% |
Drawdowns
GLO vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLO drawdown since its inception was -60.53%, which is greater than PDI's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLO and PDI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLO | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.53% | -46.47% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -14.34% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.59% | -27.23% | -31.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.59% | -46.47% | -12.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.62% | -7.66% | -18.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.09% | -6.22% | -10.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 5.03% | -2.38% |
Volatility
GLO vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison
Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 5.71%. This indicates that GLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLO | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 5.71% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 9.96% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 18.36% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 15.66% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 19.06% | +2.20% |
Financials
GLO vs. PDI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clough Global Opportunities Fund and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities