GLO vs. PDI

In the year-to-date period, GLO achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than PDI's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GLO has underperformed PDI with an annualized return of 3.08%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.81% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLO and PDI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, less than PDI's 14.20% yield.

The maximum GLO drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than PDI's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLO and PDI.

Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clough Global Opportunities Fund and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.