GLO vs. PDI
GLO (Clough Global Opportunities Fund) and PDI (PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, GLO returned 7.65%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for PDI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLO vs. PDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLO achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's -1.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLO having a 7.65% annualized return and PDI not far behind at 7.32%.
GLO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
PDI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 0.13%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.45%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
GLO vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLO Clough Global Opportunities Fund | 10.45% | 23.76% | 21.83% | 4.69% | -44.50% | 6.31% | 32.98% | 28.24% | -15.41% | 34.87% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | -1.30% | 11.03% | 17.18% | 11.99% | -16.99% | 7.81% | -9.96% | 22.23% | 7.35% | 18.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLO and PDI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2012 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
GLO:
$253.18M
PDI:
$6.69B
GLO:
$2.57
PDI:
$3.86
GLO:
2.30
PDI:
4.21
GLO:
0.05
PDI:
0.06
GLO:
5.15
PDI:
3.12
GLO:
0.90
PDI:
0.91
GLO:
$49.18M
PDI:
$2.03B
GLO:
$0.00
PDI:
$1.51B
GLO:
$116.54M
PDI:
$2.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLO vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank
GLO
PDI
GLO vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLO | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.01 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.01 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 0.02 | +9.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLO vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLO drawdown since its inception was -60.53%, which is greater than PDI's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLO and PDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLO | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.53% | -46.47% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -10.95% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -17.55% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.59% | -27.19% | -31.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.59% | -46.47% | -12.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -9.01% | -10.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.14% | -6.22% | -10.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 5.24% | -2.64% |
Volatility
GLO vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison
Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 2.87%. This indicates that GLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLO | PDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 2.87% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 8.49% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 11.43% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 15.56% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 19.05% | +2.26% |
Dividends
GLO vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison
GLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, less than PDI's 16.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLO Clough Global Opportunities Fund | 10.52% | 10.62% | 11.25% | 12.33% | 22.32% | 12.26% | 9.69% | 11.12% | 14.48% | 10.11% | 12.63% | 11.49% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 16.31% | 14.94% | 14.43% | 14.74% | 17.84% | 10.21% | 10.01% | 9.45% | 10.78% | 8.81% | 14.79% | 18.70% |
Financials
GLO vs. PDI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clough Global Opportunities Fund and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GLO and PDI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLO has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to PDI (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLO dropped -60.53% vs PDI's -46.47%.
GLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLO and PDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer