GLNK vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLNK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Chainlink (LINK), while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. GLNK is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, GLNK returned -79.50% vs 266.72% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. GLNK charges 2.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLNK having a -32.44% return and MSTZ slightly higher at -31.90%.

GLNK

• 1D: 4.99%
• 1M: 5.59%
• 6M: -39.87%
• YTD: -32.44%
• 1Y: -79.50%
• 3Y*: -21.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -11.25%
• 1M: 29.92%
• 6M: -7.52%
• YTD: -31.90%
• 1Y: 266.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-32.44%	-87.10%	67.27%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-31.90%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GLNK and MSTZ is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.44

The correlation between GLNK and MSTZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.58 (1 year) to -0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLNK vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 3
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLNK	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	1.81	-2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	2.41	-3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.31	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	3.16	-4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	6.14	-7.23

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLNK Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNK and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNK drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNK and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLNK	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	-99.38%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-89.50%	-84.89%	-4.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.66%	-97.68%	+2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.71%	-94.54%	+37.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	72.66%	43.66%	+29.00%

Volatility

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) is 14.66%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that GLNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLNK	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	57.19%	-42.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.08%	135.18%	-88.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.06%	148.74%	-44.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	162.94%	171.04%	-8.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	162.94%	171.04%	-8.10%

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLNK has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLNK vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLNK nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLNK and MSTZ in my portfolio?

GLNK and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLNK or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to GLNK (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLNK dropped -96.25% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, GLNK or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs -79.50% for GLNK. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, GLNK has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLNK or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs -79.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLNK or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLNK or MSTZ?

GLNK and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GLNK and MSTZ?

GLNK is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and REX. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for GLNK and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.