PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLNK vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLNK vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLNK vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GLNK
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF
-26.38%-87.10%38.45%585.51%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-0.30%-20.46%97.86%42.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLNK achieves a -26.38% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's -0.30% return.


GLNK

1D
3.22%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-26.38%
6M
-70.84%
1Y
-73.49%
3Y*
-7.70%
5Y*
10Y*

BITC

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
-17.10%
1Y
-9.40%
3Y*
31.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLNK vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLNK has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLNK vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLNK
GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLNK vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLNKBITCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.55

-0.35

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

-0.33

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.95

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

-0.35

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-0.56

-0.63

GLNK vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLNK Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLNK and BITC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLNKBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

-0.35

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.64

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between GLNK and BITC is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GLNK vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

GLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%.


TTM202520242023
GLNK
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.37%3.36%42.68%5.82%

Drawdowns

GLNK vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLNK drawdown since its inception was -95.82%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNK and BITC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLNKBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.82%

-38.51%

-57.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-88.29%

-26.51%

-61.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.27%

-31.48%

-63.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.92%

-15.83%

-38.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.11%

16.61%

+44.50%

Volatility

GLNK vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) has a higher volatility of 17.91% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 9.80%. This indicates that GLNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLNKBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.91%

9.80%

+8.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.33%

19.16%

+53.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.57%

26.66%

+107.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.26%

47.57%

+120.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.26%

47.57%

+120.69%