GLIN vs. DVYA
GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) and DVYA (iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - GLIN tracks the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index while DVYA tracks the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLIN returned 2.09%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for DVYA. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLIN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DVYA.
Performance
GLIN vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIN achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than DVYA's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIN has underperformed DVYA with an annualized return of 2.09%, while DVYA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.30% annualized return.
GLIN
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- -4.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
DVYA
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
GLIN vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | -3.75% | -5.47% | 15.64% | 36.13% | -21.46% | 29.57% | -0.29% | -21.49% | -37.41% | 66.53% |
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 13.35% | 30.22% | 6.05% | 13.75% | -2.17% | 3.41% | -9.61% | 14.70% | -14.87% | 16.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIN and DVYA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012 | 0.44 |
GLIN vs. DVYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLIN
DVYA
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
GLIN
DVYA
Industrials
GLIN
DVYA
Consumer Cyclical
GLIN
DVYA
Basic Materials
GLIN
DVYA
Healthcare
GLIN
DVYA
Communication Services
GLIN
DVYA
Utilities
GLIN
DVYA
Energy
GLIN
DVYA
Technology
GLIN
DVYA
Consumer Defensive
GLIN
DVYA
Real Estate
GLIN
DVYA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLIN vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank
GLIN
DVYA
GLIN vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLIN | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 3.05 | -3.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | 4.06 | -4.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.53 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 4.59 | -4.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 16.66 | -17.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLIN | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 3.05 | -3.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.66 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.42 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.30 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
GLIN vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIN drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than DVYA's maximum drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIN and DVYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIN | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.36% | -45.61% | -33.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.56% | -8.64% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.77% | -19.15% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.97% | -25.37% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.80% | -45.61% | -29.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.29% | -3.11% | -42.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.97% | -10.06% | -40.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 2.38% | +3.90% |
Volatility
GLIN vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) at 3.94%. This indicates that GLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLIN | DVYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 3.94% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 10.44% | +4.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 13.00% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 15.08% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 17.55% | +6.13% |
GLIN vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLIN vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison
GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than DVYA's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 4.33% | 4.71% | 5.97% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% |
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 0.88% | 0.84% | 3.58% | 0.96% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.42% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 1.39% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLIN and DVYA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLIN has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to DVYA (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIN dropped -79.36% vs DVYA's -45.61%.
On 10-year performance, DVYA leads with 7.30% vs 2.09% for GLIN. On fees, DVYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVYA has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DVYA has performed better with a 7.30% return vs 2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DVYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.
DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.88% for GLIN.
GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for GLIN and 0.49% for DVYA.
DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLIN and DVYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer