PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLIFX vs. GIDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIFX achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than GIDGX's 11.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX has underperformed GIDGX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while GIDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.87% annualized return.


GLIFX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.56%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
10.23%

GIDGX

1D
0.18%
1M
4.42%
YTD
11.66%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.33%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
11.66%15.74%20.59%17.92%-12.75%18.46%8.41%19.97%-8.26%15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIFX and GIDGX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between GLIFX and GIDGX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLIFX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GIDGX
GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLIFXGIDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.51

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

3.62

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

17.38

-11.50

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the GIDGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLIFX and GIDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLIFXGIDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.68

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.87

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.77

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.69

+0.16

Drawdowns

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum GIDGX drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIFX and GIDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLIFXGIDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-31.63%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-7.14%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-14.69%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.15%

-20.39%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

-31.63%

+1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.79%

0.00%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-3.87%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.48%

+1.18%

Volatility

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) at 2.46%. This indicates that GLIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLIFXGIDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

2.46%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

7.64%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.72%

9.65%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.99%

12.99%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.33%

14.16%

-0.83%

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLIFX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison

GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than GIDGX's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
5.53%5.92%12.06%4.32%8.89%8.41%1.99%4.85%5.67%3.35%2.97%3.21%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
6.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLIFX and GIDGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to GIDGX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIFX dropped -29.65% vs GIDGX's -31.63%.

GIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLIFX and GIDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer