PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLGG vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLGG vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLGG achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -55.34% return.


GLGG

1D
-0.43%
1M
-16.56%
YTD
1.59%
6M
-37.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
12.78%
1M
23.20%
YTD
-55.34%
6M
-70.69%
1Y
-21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLGG vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLGG and HOOG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLGG vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLGG

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLGG vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLGG vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLGGHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.41

-0.65

Drawdowns

GLGG vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLGG drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLGGHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.66%

-86.94%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.42%

-79.17%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.94%

-37.70%

-20.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.46%

Volatility

GLGG vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLGGHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

175.94%

137.25%

+38.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

175.94%

145.07%

+30.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

175.94%

145.07%

+30.87%

GLGG vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLGG vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

GLGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.55%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLGG and HOOG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GLGG.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 0.00% for GLGG.

Their fees differ too: 0.76% for GLGG and 0.75% for HOOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLGG and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer