GLGG.L vs. WATL.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GLGG.L (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) and WATL.L (Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist) are both Water Equities funds tracking the S&P Global Water TR, from Legal & General and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLGG.L returned 6.27%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for WATL.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLGG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for WATL.L.

Performance

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLGG.L achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than WATL.L's 1.88% return.

GLGG.L

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 0.12%
• YTD: 3.74%
• 1Y: 6.98%
• 3Y*: 9.60%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: —

WATL.L

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: -1.18%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 1Y: 0.98%
• 3Y*: 8.55%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 8.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	3.74%	7.81%	5.74%	14.58%	-7.49%	27.84%	14.90%	-14.11%
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist	1.88%	6.48%	7.33%	16.26%	-11.97%	25.45%	13.28%	8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GLGG.L and WATL.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019	0.86

The correlation between GLGG.L and WATL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLGG.L	WATL.L
Industrials	64.3%	74.9%
Utilities	15.6%	23.6%
Basic Materials	9.7%	0.2%
Technology	6.3%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	0.0%
Healthcare	2.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLGG.L

GLGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
GLGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GLGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GLGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GLGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GLGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

WATL.L

WATL.L Risk / Return Rank: 10
WATL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
WATL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
WATL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
WATL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
WATL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLGG.L	WATL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	0.08	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	0.19	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.02	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	0.08	+0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	0.19	+1.17

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the WATL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLGG.L and WATL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLGG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, smaller than the maximum WATL.L drawdown of -47.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG.L and WATL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLGG.L	WATL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.59%	-47.32%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.62%	-11.59%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.97%	-13.45%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.97%	-23.48%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.01%	-7.79%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.01%	-8.60%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	5.10%	+0.03%

Volatility

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) at 3.89%. This indicates that GLGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WATL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLGG.L	WATL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	3.89%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.90%	9.61%	+2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.37%	11.81%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.47%	13.85%	+6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	14.91%	+6.99%

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLGG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than WATL.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLGG.L vs. WATL.L - Dividend Comparison

GLGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WATL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist	1.06%	1.08%	0.76%	0.85%	0.42%	0.63%	1.22%	1.59%	2.06%	1.60%	2.22%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLGG.L and WATL.L in my portfolio?

GLGG.L and WATL.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLGG.L or WATL.L?

On fees, GLGG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLGG.L or WATL.L?

GLGG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WATL.L.

What is the main difference between GLGG.L and WATL.L?

Both ETFs track S&P Global Water TR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GLGG.L and 0.60% for WATL.L.