WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE).

WATL.L and XDWM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WATL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water TR. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. XDWM.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 16, 2016. Both WATL.L and XDWM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist	3.54%	6.48%	7.33%	16.26%	-11.97%	25.45%	13.28%	32.02%	-12.80%	14.47%
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C	11.14%	18.75%	-4.34%	8.56%	0.21%	17.12%	15.61%	19.12%	-12.12%	17.91%

Different Trading Currencies

WATL.L is traded in GBp, while XDWM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDWM.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WATL.L achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly lower than XDWM.DE's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, WATL.L has underperformed XDWM.DE with an annualized return of 10.40%, while XDWM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.

WATL.L

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -3.89%
• YTD: 3.54%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 9.27%
• 3Y*: 10.08%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

XDWM.DE

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: 11.14%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 30.38%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 12.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WATL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

WATL.L

Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist

XDWM.DE

Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C

Return for Risk

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WATL.L

WATL.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
WATL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
WATL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WATL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 30
WATL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
WATL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

XDWM.DE

XDWM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
XDWM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XDWM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XDWM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XDWM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WATL.L	XDWM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	1.69	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	2.29	-1.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.32	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	2.37	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.75	11.15	-7.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WATL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WATL.L and XDWM.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WATL.L	XDWM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	1.69	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.56	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.70	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.69	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between WATL.L and XDWM.DE is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Dividend Comparison

WATL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while XDWM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist	1.05%	1.08%	0.77%	0.84%	0.42%	0.63%	1.22%	1.59%	2.06%	1.60%	2.21%	2.43%
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WATL.L drawdown since its inception was -28.96%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWM.DE drawdown of -28.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATL.L and XDWM.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WATL.L	XDWM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.96%	-33.91%	+4.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-13.67%	+4.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.48%	-20.77%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.96%	-33.91%	+4.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.29%	-5.94%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-5.51%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.92%	+0.10%

Volatility

WATL.L vs. XDWM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) is 4.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that WATL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WATL.L	XDWM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	8.44%	-3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	13.60%	-5.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	17.94%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.21%	15.98%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.74%	17.11%	-1.37%