GLFOX vs. GWOAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX).
GLFOX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Dec 31, 2009. GWOAX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Jun 15, 2005.
Performance
GLFOX vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLFOX vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.93% | 23.53% | 6.43% | 10.59% | -1.59% | 19.67% | -4.71% | 21.95% | -4.06% | 20.44% |
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund | 3.10% | 28.37% | 6.14% | 22.49% | -14.10% | 18.53% | 10.53% | 26.56% | -12.95% | 25.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than GWOAX's 3.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX has underperformed GWOAX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while GWOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.
GLFOX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
GWOAX
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLFOX vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLFOX vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank
GLFOX
GWOAX
GLFOX vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLFOX | GWOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 1.83 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 2.51 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.52 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 11.23 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLFOX | GWOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.83 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.63 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.67 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.44 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLFOX and GWOAX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLFOX vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison
GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than GWOAX's 4.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.12% | 6.03% | 4.00% | 2.69% | 14.50% | 6.02% | 2.39% | 4.20% | 13.99% | 6.82% | 2.07% | 11.01% |
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund | 4.33% | 4.46% | 0.60% | 6.10% | 7.27% | 12.75% | 3.85% | 4.33% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 6.43% | 12.47% |
Drawdowns
GLFOX vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum GWOAX drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and GWOAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLFOX | GWOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -49.84% | +20.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -11.43% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.14% | -26.21% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -35.28% | +5.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.14% | -6.28% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -9.06% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.56% | -0.37% |
Volatility
GLFOX vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) is 4.78%, while GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that GLFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLFOX | GWOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 5.89% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 9.70% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 15.92% | -5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.72% | 15.21% | -4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 16.48% | -3.21% |