PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLEIX vs. GFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLEIX achieves a 22.15% return, which is significantly higher than GFSIX's 6.86% return.


GLEIX

1D
1.08%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
22.15%
6M
22.06%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
32.87%
5Y*
22.95%
10Y*

GFSIX

1D
0.22%
1M
2.08%
YTD
6.86%
6M
5.96%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
29.30%
5Y*
17.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
22.15%5.30%58.18%15.08%18.96%38.31%-17.46%16.95%-18.89%
GFSIX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund
6.86%36.58%28.17%25.77%-11.12%29.11%-1.28%9.12%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GLEIX and GFSIX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between GLEIX and GFSIX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLEIX vs. GFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLEIX
GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSIX
GFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) and Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLEIXGFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.27

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

10.65

-2.56

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the GFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLEIX and GFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLEIX drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than GFSIX's maximum drawdown of -46.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEIX and GFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLEIXGFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-46.39%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-9.42%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.07%

-14.49%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

-28.07%

+6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.81%

-1.05%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-7.55%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.88%

+0.20%

Volatility

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX) at 3.34%. This indicates that GLEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLEIXGFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

3.34%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

9.51%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

12.78%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

17.39%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

21.73%

+3.69%

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLEIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than GFSIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLEIX vs. GFSIX - Dividend Comparison

GLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than GFSIX's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFSIX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund
1.73%1.85%2.44%2.68%2.96%2.11%1.58%2.69%0.39%0.00%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
8.18%10.00%25.43%10.22%4.70%8.41%4.17%4.83%3.54%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLEIX and GFSIX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLEIX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GFSIX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLEIX dropped -59.27% vs GFSIX's -46.39%.

GFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLEIX and GFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer