PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFSIX vs. MS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFSIX vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFSIX vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GFSIX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund
-3.88%36.58%28.17%25.77%-11.12%29.11%-1.28%9.12%0.39%
MS
Morgan Stanley
-6.79%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-14.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFSIX achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly higher than MS's -6.79% return.


GFSIX

1D
0.10%
1M
-7.47%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
4.15%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
26.34%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*

MS

1D
3.91%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-6.79%
6M
4.73%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
19.81%
10Y*
23.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFSIX vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFSIX
GFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFSIX vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFSIXMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.48

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

1.97

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.47

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.48

7.75

-1.27

GFSIX vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the MS Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFSIX and MS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFSIXMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.48

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.70

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.27

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between GFSIX and MS is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GFSIX vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

GFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than MS's 2.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFSIX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund
1.93%1.85%2.44%2.68%2.96%2.11%1.58%2.69%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.39%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Drawdowns

GFSIX vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFSIX drawdown since its inception was -46.39%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFSIX and MS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFSIXMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.39%

-88.12%

+41.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-18.83%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.07%

-32.38%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

-13.47%

+4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-33.88%

+26.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

6.00%

-2.56%

Volatility

GFSIX vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX) is 3.94%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that GFSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFSIXMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

8.31%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

20.70%

-12.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

30.56%

-15.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

28.58%

-11.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

31.51%

-9.60%