GLDW vs. BUCK
GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
GLDW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 1.00% | 7.63% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.90% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW and BUCK is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW
BUCK
GLDW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.47 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
GLDW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.59% | -5.43% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.51% | -0.04% | -22.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -0.49% | -8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
GLDW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.90% | 3.14% | +33.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 3.49% | +33.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 3.49% | +33.41% |
GLDW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.42% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDW and BUCK have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.
GLDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for GLDW and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer