GLDN vs. SGDJ
GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) and SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds. GLDN is actively managed, while SGDJ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLDN charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDJ.
Performance
GLDN vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDN
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGDJ
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 81.52%
- 3Y*
- 50.55%
- 5Y*
- 19.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
GLDN vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | -17.58% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | -13.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDN and SGDJ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDN vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank
GLDN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGDJ
GLDN vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDN | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDN vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and SGDJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDN | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -59.27% | +25.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.96% | -26.05% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -26.25% | +9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.83% | — |
Volatility
GLDN vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDN | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.31% | 50.50% | -7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 40.78% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 40.96% | +2.35% |
GLDN vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDN vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison
GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than SGDJ's 8.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | 4.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 8.26% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GLDN and SGDJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 4.82% for GLDN.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 0.50% for SGDJ.
Find the right allocation for GLDN and SGDJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer