GLDN vs. GOEX
GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both Gold funds. GLDN is actively managed, while GOEX is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLDN charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.
Performance
GLDN vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDN
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -16.49%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOEX
- 1D
- -3.86%
- 1M
- -17.60%
- 6M
- -27.20%
- YTD
- -17.79%
- 1Y
- 49.00%
- 3Y*
- 37.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
GLDN vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | -29.47% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -28.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDN and GOEX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDN vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank
GLDN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GOEX
GLDN vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDN | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDN vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDN drawdown since its inception was -35.79%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDN and GOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDN | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.79% | -88.83% | +53.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.79% | -39.33% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -63.36% | +43.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.46% | — |
Volatility
GLDN vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDN | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.06% | 52.43% | -10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.06% | 39.86% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.06% | 40.19% | +1.87% |
GLDN vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDN has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDN vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison
GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than GOEX's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | 6.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.67% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GLDN and GOEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GOEX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOEX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.
GLDN has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 2.67% for GOEX.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for GLDN and 0.65% for GOEX.
Find the right allocation for GLDN and GOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer