PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDA.DE vs. XAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLDA.DE is traded in EUR, while XAIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XAIX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than XAIX's 29.54% return.


GLDA.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.73%
6M
6.14%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*

XAIX

1D
-6.86%
1M
8.43%
YTD
29.54%
6M
28.28%
1Y
51.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
2.73%48.99%12.94%
XAIX
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF
29.54%13.74%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDA.DE and XAIX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2024

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDA.DE
GLDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XAIX
XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDA.DEXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.96

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

11.74

-7.14

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the XAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDA.DE and XAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDA.DEXAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.38

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.51

-0.41

Drawdowns

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum XAIX drawdown of -27.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and XAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDA.DEXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.34%

-27.79%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-13.17%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.01%

-9.69%

-5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-5.12%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

4.44%

+2.10%

Volatility

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) is 5.11%, while Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that GLDA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDA.DEXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

11.74%

-6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

18.26%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.11%

21.89%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

25.00%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

25.00%

-9.15%

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XAIX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDA.DE vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison

GLDA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM20252024
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAIX
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF
0.42%0.54%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDA.DE and XAIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.

GLDA.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while XAIX is Technology Equities. GLDA.DE tracks Gold, while XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.DE and 0.35% for XAIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and XAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer