GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE
GLDA.DE (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) and LYP6.DE (Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDA.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while LYP6.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDA.DE returned 19.71%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for LYP6.DE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYP6.DE.
Performance
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than LYP6.DE's 7.48% return.
GLDA.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.03%
- 5Y*
- 19.71%
- 10Y*
- —
LYP6.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.DE Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 2.73% | 48.99% | 34.24% | 9.40% | 7.00% | 3.88% | 12.92% | 8.39% |
LYP6.DE Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc | 7.48% | 20.82% | 8.25% | 15.97% | -10.40% | 24.81% | -1.72% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.DE and LYP6.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2019 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, GLDA.DE and LYP6.DE have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.DE
LYP6.DE
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDA.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.74 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 6.63 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDA.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.67 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.56 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum LYP6.DE drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and LYP6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -35.51% | +17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -9.45% | -7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -16.26% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -20.71% | +4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.01% | -1.62% | -13.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -4.84% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 2.49% | +4.05% |
Volatility
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.35%. This indicates that GLDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 4.35% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.17% | 10.65% | +9.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.11% | 12.90% | +10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 14.41% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 15.86% | -0.01% |
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLDA.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.DE nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDA.DE and LYP6.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GLDA.DE.
GLDA.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while LYP6.DE is Europe Equities. GLDA.DE tracks Gold, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.DE and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.
Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and LYP6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer