PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Robotics & AI ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (GOAI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly lower than GOAI.DE's 22.11% return.


GLDA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.94%
YTD
-5.73%
6M
-6.84%
1Y
23.36%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*

GOAI.DE

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
22.11%
6M
22.26%
1Y
39.86%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
-5.73%48.99%34.24%9.40%7.00%3.88%12.92%6.37%
GOAI.DE
Amundi MSCI Robotics & AI ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc
22.11%6.11%21.03%26.97%-21.63%32.03%16.95%9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDA.DE and GOAI.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2019

0.02

The correlation between GLDA.DE and GOAI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDA.DE
GLDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GOAI.DE
GOAI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GOAI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOAI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOAI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GOAI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOAI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Robotics & AI ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (GOAI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDA.DEGOAI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

2.75

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

7.15

-4.20

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the GOAI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDA.DE and GOAI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.00%, smaller than the maximum GOAI.DE drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and GOAI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDA.DEGOAI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.00%

-34.25%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.00%

-14.45%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-28.67%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-28.67%

+6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-6.44%

-15.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-7.16%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.94%

5.56%

+2.38%

Volatility

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Robotics & AI ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (GOAI.DE) have volatilities of 7.96% and 8.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDA.DEGOAI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

8.03%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.33%

15.83%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.15%

20.85%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

19.83%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

20.27%

-4.19%

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GOAI.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDA.DE vs. GOAI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDA.DE nor GOAI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDA.DE and GOAI.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GOAI.DE.

GLDA.DE is categorized as Gold, while GOAI.DE is Robotics. GLDA.DE tracks Gold, while GOAI.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Robotics & AI ESG Filtered. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.DE and 0.35% for GOAI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and GOAI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer