PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly higher than CD91.DE's -8.09% return.


GLDA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.94%
YTD
-5.73%
6M
-6.84%
1Y
23.36%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*

CD91.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
-10.88%
YTD
-8.09%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
58.41%
3Y*
38.73%
5Y*
20.74%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
-5.73%48.99%34.24%9.40%7.00%3.88%12.92%6.37%
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
-8.09%132.46%20.72%2.57%-1.60%-7.98%15.46%13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDA.DE and CD91.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2019

0.70

The correlation between GLDA.DE and CD91.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDA.DE
GLDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CD91.DE
CD91.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CD91.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDA.DECD91.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.75

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

4.51

-1.56

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the CD91.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDA.DE and CD91.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.00%, smaller than the maximum CD91.DE drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and CD91.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDA.DECD91.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.00%

-83.13%

+61.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.00%

-33.29%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-33.29%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-39.55%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-31.05%

+9.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-53.47%

+47.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.94%

12.91%

-4.97%

Volatility

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) is 7.96%, while Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist (CD91.DE) has a volatility of 17.14%. This indicates that GLDA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CD91.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDA.DECD91.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

17.14%

-9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.33%

36.98%

-15.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.15%

44.98%

-20.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

34.94%

-18.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

34.55%

-18.47%

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CD91.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDA.DE vs. CD91.DE - Dividend Comparison

GLDA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CD91.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CD91.DE
Amundi NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF Dist
0.17%0.16%0.33%2.50%1.04%0.54%0.17%0.33%0.00%0.69%
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDA.DE and CD91.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CD91.DE.

GLDA.DE tracks Gold, while CD91.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.DE and 0.65% for CD91.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and CD91.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer