PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDA.DE achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly lower than 8PSE.DE's 83.34% return.


GLDA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.94%
YTD
-5.73%
6M
-6.84%
1Y
23.36%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*

8PSE.DE

1D
-3.05%
1M
-11.31%
YTD
83.34%
6M
83.34%
1Y
83.34%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
-5.73%48.99%34.24%9.40%7.00%3.88%-4.39%
8PSE.DE
Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
83.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%-1.85%4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDA.DE and 8PSE.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.34

Over the past year, GLDA.DE and 8PSE.DE have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDA.DE
GLDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

8PSE.DE
8PSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDA.DE8PSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.97

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.73

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

3.70

-0.75

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the 8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDA.DE and 8PSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.00%, smaller than the maximum 8PSE.DE drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.DE and 8PSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDA.DE8PSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.00%

-47.85%

+25.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.00%

-47.85%

+25.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-47.85%

+25.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-47.85%

+25.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-25.16%

+3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-9.84%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.94%

22.43%

-14.49%

Volatility

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) is 7.96%, while Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) has a volatility of 9.10%. This indicates that GLDA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 8PSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDA.DE8PSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

9.10%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.33%

76.34%

-55.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.15%

150.14%

-125.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

67.03%

-50.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

61.70%

-45.62%

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 8PSE.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDA.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDA.DE nor 8PSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDA.DE and 8PSE.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for 8PSE.DE.

GLDA.DE tracks Gold, while 8PSE.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.DE and 0.34% for 8PSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDA.DE and 8PSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer