GLD vs. XLY
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.16%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for XLY. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
GLD vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLD having a -2.52% return and XLY slightly higher at -2.41%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 12.16% annualized return and XLY not far ahead at 12.72%.
GLD
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -10.77%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- 25.28%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
XLY
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -2.41%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
GLD vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.52% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.41% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and XLY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004 | 0.01 |
The correlation between GLD and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLD vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLD
XLY
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GLD
XLY
-
Communication Services
GLD
-
XLY
Consumer Cyclical
GLD
-
XLY
Consumer Defensive
GLD
-
XLY
-
Energy
GLD
-
XLY
-
Financial Services
GLD
-
XLY
-
Healthcare
GLD
-
XLY
-
Industrials
GLD
-
XLY
Real Estate
GLD
-
XLY
-
Technology
GLD
-
XLY
Utilities
GLD
-
XLY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
XLY
GLD vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLD | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 0.62 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 1.89 | +1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLD vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -59.05% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.46% | -14.98% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.46% | -26.01% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.46% | -39.67% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.46% | -39.67% | +15.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | -6.41% | -15.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -9.55% | -6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 4.86% | +3.52% |
Volatility
GLD vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) at 6.20%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 6.20% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.10% | 13.52% | +10.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 18.29% | +9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 23.84% | -5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 22.08% | -6.00% |
GLD vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and XLY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to XLY (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.72% vs 12.16% for GLD. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.13% for XLY.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer