PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 12.15% annualized return and VYM not far behind at 11.95%.


GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%

VYM

1D
0.80%
1M
3.01%
YTD
12.37%
6M
11.19%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.37%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and VYM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.06

The correlation between GLD and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLD vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLD
VYM

Basic Materials

100.0%
3.5%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.1%

Energy

-

9.8%

Financial Services

-

20.5%

Healthcare

-

12.2%

Industrials

-

12.1%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

17.7%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Basic Materials

GLD
100.0%
VYM
3.5%

Communication Services

GLD

-

VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GLD

-

VYM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

GLD

-

VYM
8.1%

Energy

GLD

-

VYM
9.8%

Financial Services

GLD

-

VYM
20.5%

Healthcare

GLD

-

VYM
12.2%

Industrials

GLD

-

VYM
12.1%

Real Estate

GLD

-

VYM
0.0%

Technology

GLD

-

VYM
17.7%

Utilities

GLD

-

VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

3.70

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

13.81

-11.00

GLD vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-56.98%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-6.69%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-14.46%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-15.84%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-35.21%

+10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-0.52%

-21.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-7.18%

-8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

1.80%

+6.69%

Volatility

GLD vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.31%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

3.31%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

7.81%

+16.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

10.47%

+16.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

13.99%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

16.35%

-0.27%

GLD vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and VYM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to VYM (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.15% vs 11.95% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.15% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while VYM is Dividend. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer