PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. IGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed IGV with an annualized return of 11.27%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.60% annualized return.


GLD

1D
-0.22%
1M
-5.04%
6M
-12.74%
YTD
-7.24%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
26.36%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
11.27%
ALL TIME*
10.24%

IGV

1D
0.19%
1M
4.37%
6M
-5.40%
YTD
-12.01%
1Y
-16.26%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
15.60%
ALL TIME*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-7.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
-12.01%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%34.33%12.44%42.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and IGV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDIGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.92

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

-0.45

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

-0.86

+2.57

GLD vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and IGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDIGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-63.45%

+17.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-36.61%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

-36.61%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-45.85%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.40%

-45.85%

+19.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.87%

-21.05%

-4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-14.48%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

18.89%

-7.61%

Volatility

GLD vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 6.38%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDIGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

7.17%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.20%

25.18%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.06%

28.69%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

28.08%

-9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

26.41%

-10.30%

GLD vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and IGV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to GLD (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs IGV's -63.45%.

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.60% vs 11.27% for GLD. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 6.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.60% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while IGV is Technology Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.39% for IGV.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and IGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer