GKAT vs. NZAC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GKAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.

Performance

GKAT vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than NZAC's 6.02% return.

GKAT

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: 5.08%
• 6M: 5.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NZAC

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: 6.02%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 17.81%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GKAT vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	5.08%	5.93%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	6.02%	6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GKAT and NZAC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

GKAT vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GKAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 47
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 45
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GKAT vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GKAT	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.52	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.14	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.05	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.63	—

Drawdowns

GKAT vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GKAT	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-33.72%	+23.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.15%	-3.38%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-5.31%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GKAT	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	13.73%	-1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.54%	16.94%	-4.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.54%	17.13%	-4.59%

GKAT vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

GKAT vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than NZAC's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	0.46%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.09%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GKAT and NZAC in my portfolio?

GKAT and NZAC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GKAT or NZAC?

On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GKAT or NZAC?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GKAT or NZAC?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.46% for GKAT.

What is the main difference between GKAT and NZAC?

They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.12% for NZAC.