GK vs. BEDZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ).

GK and BEDZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GK is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Jul 2, 2021. BEDZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 21, 2021.

Performance

GK vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GK vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	-6.67%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-42.76%	4.95%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	-6.46%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	7.61%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GK having a -6.67% return and BEDZ slightly higher at -6.46%.

GK

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -6.15%
• YTD: -6.67%
• 6M: -8.74%
• 1Y: 22.42%
• 3Y*: 12.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEDZ

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: -6.46%
• 6M: -4.76%
• 1Y: 10.13%
• 3Y*: 9.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.

BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

GK

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF

Return for Risk

GK vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 56
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 57
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GK	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.40	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	0.77	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.10	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	0.69	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.76	1.90	+3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GK vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GK Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GK and BEDZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GK	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.40	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.22	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between GK and BEDZ is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GK vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than BEDZ's 2.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.08%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.47%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%

Drawdowns

GK vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and BEDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	BEDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-29.70%	-18.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-15.24%	+0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.88%	-9.90%	-3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.73%	-8.25%	-16.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	5.53%	-1.55%

Volatility

GK vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) at 6.59%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GK	BEDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	6.59%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.40%	15.40%	-2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.28%	25.68%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.06%	24.97%	-0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.06%	24.97%	-0.91%