GJRTX vs. GSRAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GJRTX (Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class) and GSRAX (Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - GJRTX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSRAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GJRTX returned 5.65%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for GSRAX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GJRTX charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for GSRAX.

Performance

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJRTX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than GSRAX's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GJRTX has underperformed GSRAX with an annualized return of 5.65%, while GSRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.

GJRTX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 15.01%
• 3Y*: 9.68%
• 5Y*: 5.77%
• 10Y*: 5.65%

GSRAX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 11.17%
• 1Y: 18.51%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 12.40%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GJRTX Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class	6.72%	9.71%	7.04%	10.82%	-6.26%	6.45%	3.61%	10.91%	-2.47%	7.46%
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund	11.61%	6.66%	26.07%	17.49%	-7.78%	31.47%	8.75%	25.63%	-6.65%	17.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GJRTX and GSRAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009	0.82

The correlation between GJRTX and GSRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GJRTX vs. GSRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJRTX

GJRTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
GJRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GJRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GJRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
GJRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GJRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GSRAX

GSRAX Risk / Return Rank: 42
GSRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GSRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
GSRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GSRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GSRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GJRTX	GSRAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	1.74	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	2.50	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.31	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	2.74	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.51	10.31	+5.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the GSRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJRTX and GSRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GJRTX	GSRAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	1.74	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.62	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.64	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.49	+0.21

Drawdowns

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJRTX drawdown since its inception was -13.23%, smaller than the maximum GSRAX drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJRTX and GSRAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GJRTX	GSRAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.23%	-44.40%	+31.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.28%	-7.32%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.48%	-25.43%	+16.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.82%	-25.43%	+14.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.23%	-38.97%	+25.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-6.07%	+3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	1.94%	-0.96%

Volatility

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) is 1.51%, while Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that GJRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GJRTX	GSRAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	2.85%	-1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.53%	8.33%	-3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.77%	11.52%	-5.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.70%	20.21%	-13.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.48%	19.87%	-13.39%

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJRTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GSRAX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GJRTX vs. GSRAX - Dividend Comparison

GJRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than GSRAX's 11.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GJRTX Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class	1.99%	2.13%	1.14%	2.71%	5.24%	8.88%	0.61%	3.60%	2.69%	3.52%	0.64%	1.80%
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund	11.34%	12.17%	25.88%	9.60%	14.01%	11.55%	4.39%	11.85%	97.89%	21.56%	3.16%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GJRTX and GSRAX in my portfolio?

GJRTX and GSRAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GJRTX or GSRAX?

GSRAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to GJRTX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJRTX dropped -13.23% vs GSRAX's -44.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GJRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.