PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJRTX vs. GSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJRTX achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than GSINX's 8.09% return.


GJRTX

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.35%
6M
4.14%
YTD
5.70%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
8.24%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
5.37%
ALL TIME*
4.15%

GSINX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.07%
6M
4.40%
YTD
8.09%
1Y
15.57%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
5.70%9.71%7.04%10.82%-6.26%6.45%3.61%10.91%-2.47%7.46%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
8.09%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%27.41%-6.14%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GJRTX and GSINX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between GJRTX and GSINX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GJRTX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GJRTX
GJRTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GJRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GJRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GJRTXGSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.01

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

5.47

+5.22

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJRTX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJRTX drawdown since its inception was -13.23%, smaller than the maximum GSINX drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJRTX and GSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GJRTXGSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-28.80%

+15.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-7.80%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.48%

-10.32%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.82%

-25.46%

+14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-2.18%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-4.84%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.85%

-1.80%

Volatility

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) is 1.96%, while Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that GJRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GJRTXGSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

2.72%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

8.18%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.48%

9.87%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

14.26%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.50%

15.61%

-9.11%

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJRTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

GJRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than GSINX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
2.01%2.13%1.14%2.71%5.24%8.88%0.61%3.60%2.69%3.52%0.64%1.80%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.65%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GJRTX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSINX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to GJRTX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJRTX dropped -13.23% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

GJRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GJRTX and GSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer