PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJRTX vs. GSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GJRTX having a 6.72% return and GSINX slightly lower at 6.39%.


GJRTX

1D
0.26%
1M
2.88%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.19%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
5.65%

GSINX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
6.72%9.71%7.04%10.82%-6.26%6.45%3.61%10.91%-2.47%7.00%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.39%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%27.41%-6.14%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GJRTX and GSINX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between GJRTX and GSINX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GJRTX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJRTX
GJRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GJRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GJRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GJRTXGSINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.64

1.25

+1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

1.76

+2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.23

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

1.55

+2.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.51

5.17

+10.35

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJRTX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GJRTXGSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.25

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.63

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.81

-0.11

Drawdowns

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJRTX drawdown since its inception was -13.23%, smaller than the maximum GSINX drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJRTX and GSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GJRTXGSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-28.80%

+15.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-7.80%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.48%

-10.32%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.82%

-25.46%

+14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.72%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-4.85%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.33%

-1.35%

Volatility

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) is 1.51%, while Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that GJRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GJRTXGSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

2.75%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

7.89%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

9.68%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

14.37%

-7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

15.69%

-9.21%

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJRTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GJRTX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

GJRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than GSINX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
1.99%2.13%1.14%2.71%5.24%8.88%0.61%3.60%2.69%3.52%0.64%1.80%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GJRTX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSINX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to GJRTX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJRTX dropped -13.23% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

GJRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GJRTX and GSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer