GSRAX vs. FAGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) and Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX).
GSRAX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 23, 2004. FAGIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1977.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSRAX or FAGIX.
Key characteristics
| GSRAX | FAGIX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.43% | 4.28% |
| 1Y Return | 20.80% | 13.30% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.57% | 3.43% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.73% | 6.37% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.45% | 6.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.68 | 2.75 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.72% | 4.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.97% | -37.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.37% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSRAX and FAGIX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSRAX vs. FAGIX - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSRAX having a 4.43% return and FAGIX slightly lower at 4.28%. Over the past 10 years, GSRAX has outperformed FAGIX with an annualized return of 9.45%, while FAGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSRAX vs. FAGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSRAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FAGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSRAX vs. FAGIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) and Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSRAX vs. FAGIX - Dividend Comparison
GSRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, more than FAGIX's 5.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund | 8.77% | 9.59% | 14.97% | 11.55% | 4.39% | 11.85% | 97.89% | 21.56% | 3.16% | 0.92% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
FAGIX Fidelity Capital & Income Fund | 5.22% | 5.29% | 11.37% | 6.55% | 4.88% | 4.98% | 7.31% | 5.03% | 4.12% | 5.00% | 8.04% | 5.47% |
Drawdowns
GSRAX vs. FAGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSRAX drawdown since its inception was -38.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FAGIX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSRAX and FAGIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSRAX vs. FAGIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) at 1.82%. This indicates that GSRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.