GSRAX vs. GS
GSRAX (Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GSRAX returned 12.78%/yr vs 25.36%/yr for GS. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GSRAX vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSRAX achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 27.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GSRAX has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 12.78%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 25.36% annualized return.
GSRAX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 10.74%
- 1Y
- 19.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
GS
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 11.49%
- YTD
- 27.09%
- 6M
- 24.26%
- 1Y
- 76.13%
- 3Y*
- 55.66%
- 5Y*
- 28.17%
- 10Y*
- 25.36%
GSRAX vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund | 11.61% | 6.66% | 26.07% | 17.49% | -7.78% | 31.47% | 8.75% | 25.63% | -6.65% | 17.59% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 27.09% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSRAX and GS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.65 |
The correlation between GSRAX and GS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSRAX vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
GSRAX
GS
GSRAX vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSRAX | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.94 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 13.07 | -3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSRAX vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSRAX drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSRAX and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSRAX | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -78.84% | +34.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -19.42% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -30.90% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -32.84% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.97% | -48.75% | +9.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | 0.00% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -22.63% | +16.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 5.84% | -3.90% |
Volatility
GSRAX vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) is 4.24%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 10.02%. This indicates that GSRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSRAX | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 10.02% | -5.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 23.22% | -14.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 28.46% | -16.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 28.03% | -7.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 29.87% | -9.98% |
Dividends
GSRAX vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
GSRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than GS's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.54% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund | 11.34% | 12.17% | 25.88% | 9.60% | 14.01% | 11.55% | 4.39% | 11.85% | 97.89% | 21.56% | 3.16% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSRAX and GS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to GSRAX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSRAX dropped -44.40% vs GS's -78.84%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSRAX and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer