PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJRTX vs. SHRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I (SHRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJRTX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than SHRIX's 1.46% return.


GJRTX

1D
0.26%
1M
2.88%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.19%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
5.65%

SHRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.46%
6M
2.18%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
6.72%9.71%7.04%10.82%-6.26%6.45%3.61%10.91%-2.47%3.65%
SHRIX
Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I
1.46%10.70%16.73%21.07%-3.37%1.88%6.86%4.58%2.81%-7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GJRTX and SHRIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GJRTX vs. SHRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJRTX
GJRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GJRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GJRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRIX
SHRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SHRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) and Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I (SHRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GJRTXSHRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.64

5.28

-2.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

6.10

-2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

4.89

-3.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

6.67

-3.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.51

23.33

-7.82

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is lower than the SHRIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJRTX and SHRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GJRTXSHRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

5.28

-2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.45

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.93

-0.23

Drawdowns

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJRTX drawdown since its inception was -13.23%, smaller than the maximum SHRIX drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJRTX and SHRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GJRTXSHRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-14.34%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-1.87%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.48%

-6.91%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.82%

-12.69%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-2.06%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.53%

+0.45%

Volatility

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class (GJRTX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I (SHRIX) at 0.25%. This indicates that GJRTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GJRTXSHRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.25%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

2.03%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

2.37%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

6.26%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

6.29%

+0.19%

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJRTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRIX's 1.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

GJRTX vs. SHRIX - Dividend Comparison

GJRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than SHRIX's 10.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GJRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund Institutional Class
1.99%2.13%1.14%2.71%5.24%8.88%0.61%3.60%2.69%3.52%0.64%1.80%
SHRIX
Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I
10.77%10.92%14.34%12.34%3.89%4.61%6.34%5.06%5.09%0.35%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GJRTX and SHRIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GJRTX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to SHRIX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJRTX dropped -13.23% vs SHRIX's -14.34%.

SHRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.28 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GJRTX and SHRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer