GITS vs. NBIS
GITS (Global Interactive Technologies, Inc) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Internet Content & Information industry within the Communication Services sector. Over the past year, GITS returned -8.44% vs 266.17% for NBIS. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GITS vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GITS achieves a 206.71% return, which is significantly higher than NBIS's 127.48% return.
GITS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- -42.44%
- YTD
- 206.71%
- 1Y
- -8.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -44.34%
NBIS
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- 6M
- 123.51%
- YTD
- 127.48%
- 1Y
- 266.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 265.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $81.86K | $65.60K | $1.52M | |
| $4.73B | $4.16B | $4.21B |
GITS vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GITS Global Interactive Technologies, Inc | 206.71% | -85.68% | -11.75% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 127.48% | 202.18% | -17.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GITS and NBIS is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
GITS:
$7.97M
NBIS:
$45.70B
GITS:
-$1.30
NBIS:
$3.08
GITS:
3.77K
NBIS:
58.84
GITS:
2.70
NBIS:
8.12
GITS:
$2.03K
NBIS:
$877.90M
GITS:
-$73.32K
NBIS:
$420.60M
GITS:
-$3.60M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GITS vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
GITS
NBIS
GITS vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Interactive Technologies, Inc (GITS) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GITS | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 5.21 | -5.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 11.53 | -11.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GITS vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GITS drawdown since its inception was -89.80%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GITS and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GITS | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.80% | -58.27% | -31.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.66% | -48.30% | -25.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.26% | -33.58% | -34.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.25% | -19.18% | -50.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.45% | 21.79% | +24.66% |
Volatility
GITS vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Interactive Technologies, Inc (GITS) is 25.51%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 45.48%. This indicates that GITS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GITS | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.51% | 45.48% | -19.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.81% | 83.51% | +23.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 203.93% | 113.57% | +90.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 244.20% | 113.26% | +130.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 244.20% | 113.26% | +130.94% |
Dividends
GITS vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither GITS nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GITS vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Interactive Technologies, Inc and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GITS and NBIS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (45.48%) compared to GITS (25.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GITS dropped -89.80% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GITS and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer