PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GITS vs. SEZL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GITS vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Interactive Technologies, Inc (GITS) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GITS achieves a 206.71% return, which is significantly higher than SEZL's 143.80% return.


GITS

1D
1.88%
1M
2.36%
6M
-42.44%
YTD
206.71%
1Y
-8.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-44.34%

SEZL

1D
-0.23%
1M
-15.55%
6M
144.70%
YTD
143.80%
1Y
7.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
251.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$81.86K$65.60K$1.52M
$71.68M$100.82M$92.07M

GITS vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GITS
Global Interactive Technologies, Inc
206.71%-85.68%-11.75%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock
143.80%48.89%-21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GITS and SEZL is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GITS:

$7.97M

SEZL:

$5.20B

EPS

GITS:

-$1.30

SEZL:

$4.16

PS Ratio

GITS:

3.77K

SEZL:

11.46

PB Ratio

GITS:

2.70

SEZL:

27.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

GITS:

$2.03K

SEZL:

$480.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GITS:

-$73.32K

SEZL:

$426.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

GITS:

-$3.60M

SEZL:

$193.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GITS vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GITS
GITS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GITS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GITS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SEZL
SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GITS vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Interactive Technologies, Inc (GITS) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GITSSEZLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.09

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.00

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.19

-0.00

-0.19

GITS vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GITS Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GITS and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GITS vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GITS drawdown since its inception was -89.80%, roughly equal to the maximum SEZL drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GITS and SEZL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GITSSEZLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.80%

-89.95%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.66%

-67.53%

-6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.26%

-17.93%

-50.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.25%

-38.95%

-30.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.45%

47.40%

-0.95%

Volatility

GITS vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

Global Interactive Technologies, Inc (GITS) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) at 24.29%. This indicates that GITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GITSSEZLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.51%

24.29%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.81%

65.32%

+41.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.93%

87.01%

+116.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

244.20%

200.71%

+43.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

244.20%

200.71%

+43.49%

Dividends

GITS vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

Neither GITS nor SEZL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GITS vs. SEZL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Interactive Technologies, Inc and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GITS and SEZL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GITS has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to SEZL (24.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GITS dropped -89.80% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

SEZL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GITS and SEZL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer