PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINX vs. FGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINX vs. FGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GINX having a 11.48% return and FGD slightly lower at 11.09%.


GINX

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.24%
YTD
11.48%
6M
14.47%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FGD

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.09%
YTD
11.09%
6M
12.57%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINX vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
11.48%25.06%5.69%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
11.09%44.42%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GINX and FGD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024

0.74

The correlation between GINX and FGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINX vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINX
FGD

Financial Services

29.3%
33.6%

Technology

10.7%
1.2%

Energy

10.4%
10.0%

Healthcare

9.9%

-

Industrials

9.4%
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
9.2%

Utilities

7.0%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
8.8%

Communication Services

4.8%
9.3%

Basic Materials

4.1%
6.4%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.4%

Financial Services

GINX
29.3%
FGD
33.6%

Technology

GINX
10.7%
FGD
1.2%

Energy

GINX
10.4%
FGD
10.0%

Healthcare

GINX
9.9%
FGD

-

Industrials

GINX
9.4%
FGD
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

GINX
7.9%
FGD
9.2%

Utilities

GINX
7.0%
FGD
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GINX
4.9%
FGD
8.8%

Communication Services

GINX
4.8%
FGD
9.3%

Basic Materials

GINX
4.1%
FGD
6.4%

Real Estate

GINX
1.7%
FGD
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINX vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINX
GINX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINX vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINXFGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.41

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

12.03

+0.21

GINX vs. FGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINX and FGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINXFGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.67

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.26

+1.11

Drawdowns

GINX vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINX drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, smaller than the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINX and FGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINXFGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-68.05%

+55.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-9.82%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-2.05%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-12.57%

+10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.78%

-0.45%

Volatility

GINX vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison

SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) at 3.20%. This indicates that GINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINXFGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.20%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

9.73%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

12.56%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

14.92%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

18.23%

-4.39%

GINX vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FGD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINX vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison

GINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than FGD's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.09%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
2.19%2.81%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GINX and FGD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GINX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to FGD (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINX dropped -12.53% vs FGD's -68.05%.

On 1-year performance, FGD leads with 33.36% vs 28.48% for GINX. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FGD has performed better with a 33.36% return vs 28.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 2.19% for GINX.

They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for GINX and 0.59% for FGD.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINX and FGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer