GINX vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GINX (SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GINX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GINX returned 29.75% vs -1.50% for GABF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GINX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

GINX vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINX achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -4.42% return.

GINX

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 11.98%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 29.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -5.68%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINX vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	11.98%	25.06%	5.77%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-4.42%	3.60%	34.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GINX and GABF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	0.62

The correlation between GINX and GABF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINX vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GINX	GABF
Financial Services	31.1%	85.6%
Technology	11.1%	5.2%
Energy	9.6%	-
Healthcare	9.5%	-
Industrials	9.1%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	-
Utilities	5.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	-
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	4.3%

Return for Risk

GINX vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINX

GINX Risk / Return Rank: 79
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINX vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GINX	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	-0.09	+2.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	0.00	+3.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.00	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	-0.09	+3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.79	-0.20	+12.98

GINX vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINX and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GINX vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINX drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINX and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINX	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.53%	-20.86%	+8.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-17.16%	+8.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-9.12%	+7.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-4.90%	+3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	7.55%	-5.22%

Volatility

GINX vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) is 3.70%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that GINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINX	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	4.38%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	13.29%	-3.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	17.47%	-5.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.84%	20.48%	-6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	20.48%	-6.64%

GINX vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINX vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

GINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than GABF's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.05%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	2.18%	2.81%	2.97%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINX and GABF in my portfolio?

GINX and GABF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GINX or GABF?

GABF has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to GINX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINX dropped -12.53% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, GINX or GABF?

On 1-year performance, GINX leads with 29.75% vs -1.50% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GINX has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GINX or GABF?

Over the 1-year period, GINX has performed better with a 29.75% return vs -1.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINX or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINX or GABF?

GINX has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 2.05% for GABF.

What is the main difference between GINX and GABF?

GINX is categorized as Global Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for GINX and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.