PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINX vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINX vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINX achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.


GINX

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.24%
YTD
11.48%
6M
14.47%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINX vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GINX and BDVL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.79

GINX vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINX
BDVL

Financial Services

29.3%
13.9%

Technology

10.7%
23.0%

Energy

10.4%
2.8%

Healthcare

9.9%
11.1%

Industrials

9.4%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
6.3%

Utilities

7.0%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
8.5%

Communication Services

4.8%
10.7%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Financial Services

GINX
29.3%
BDVL
13.9%

Technology

GINX
10.7%
BDVL
23.0%

Energy

GINX
10.4%
BDVL
2.8%

Healthcare

GINX
9.9%
BDVL
11.1%

Industrials

GINX
9.4%
BDVL
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

GINX
7.9%
BDVL
6.3%

Utilities

GINX
7.0%
BDVL
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GINX
4.9%
BDVL
8.5%

Communication Services

GINX
4.8%
BDVL
10.7%

Basic Materials

GINX
4.1%
BDVL
2.6%

Real Estate

GINX
1.7%
BDVL
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINX vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINX
GINX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINX vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINXBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

GINX vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINXBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.01

+0.35

Drawdowns

GINX vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINX drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINX and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINXBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-7.71%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.95%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-1.19%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

Volatility

GINX vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINXBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

9.49%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

9.49%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

9.49%

+4.35%

GINX vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINX vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

GINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
2.66%2.79%0.00%
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
2.19%2.81%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


GINX and BDVL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.19% for GINX.

They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for GINX and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINX and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer