GINN vs. TSXU
GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GINN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
GINN vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 144.17% return.
GINN
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- 5.69%
- 1M
- 70.75%
- YTD
- 144.17%
- 6M
- 129.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GINN vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 8.64% | -0.77% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 144.17% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GINN and TSXU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GINN vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
GINN
TSXU
GINN vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GINN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GINN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 4.66 | -4.21 |
Drawdowns
GINN vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GINN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.25% | -35.62% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | 0.00% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -10.61% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | — | — |
Volatility
GINN vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GINN | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 78.89% | -62.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 78.89% | -57.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 78.89% | -57.84% |
GINN vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GINN vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than TSXU's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.19% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GINN and TSXU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.16% for GINN.
GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for GINN and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer