GINN vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GINN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GINN returned 17.14%/yr vs -30.65%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

GINN vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.

GINN

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 1.56%
• 6M: 3.58%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 1Y: 18.27%
• 3Y*: 17.14%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	7.78%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-0.77%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and BITI is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.46

The correlation between GINN and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.55 (1 year) to -0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GINN vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 37
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 39

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GINN	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.56	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	2.13	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.26	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	2.72	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.81	6.78	-1.97

GINN vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GINN vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-92.16%	+50.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-25.28%	+12.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.25%	-84.63%	+62.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-85.94%	+83.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.18%	-68.34%	+55.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	10.11%	-6.30%

Volatility

GINN vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 4.43%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINN	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	11.38%	-6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	34.25%	-21.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.52%	44.14%	-27.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.45%	52.28%	-30.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.01%	52.28%	-31.27%

GINN vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINN vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.17%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINN and BITI in my portfolio?

GINN and BITI have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GINN or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to GINN (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, GINN or BITI?

On 3-year performance, GINN leads with 17.14% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GINN or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, GINN has performed better with a 17.14% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINN or BITI?

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINN or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 1.17% for GINN.

What is the main difference between GINN and BITI?

GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.