PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIMFX vs. WMRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMFX achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 16.46% return. Over the past 10 years, GIMFX has outperformed WMRIX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while WMRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.56% annualized return.


GIMFX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.20%
6M
9.43%
YTD
14.93%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
7.14%
ALL TIME*
6.30%

WMRIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.70%
6M
11.32%
YTD
16.46%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
5.56%
ALL TIME*
6.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
14.93%25.37%2.67%14.75%-1.24%4.05%-7.25%13.24%-5.58%14.09%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
16.46%12.79%2.57%1.12%-8.03%21.49%-2.19%16.85%-7.21%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GIMFX and WMRIX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.60

The correlation between GIMFX and WMRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIMFX vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIMFX
GIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

WMRIX
WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIMFXWMRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.50

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.43

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.61

11.67

+4.94

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is higher than the WMRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMFX and WMRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMFX drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum WMRIX drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMFX and WMRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIMFXWMRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.87%

-37.84%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.53%

-7.13%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.02%

-10.95%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.20%

-22.03%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.87%

-31.27%

+5.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-2.49%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-7.15%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.09%

-0.31%

Volatility

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) have volatilities of 2.10% and 2.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIMFXWMRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

2.10%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

6.59%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.16%

8.87%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.64%

11.44%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.94%

12.51%

-3.57%

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMFX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIMFX vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison

GIMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than WMRIX's 6.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
4.29%4.28%3.39%5.93%3.59%3.28%2.25%3.99%4.59%2.95%1.98%0.00%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
6.12%7.15%1.02%3.51%6.07%9.29%1.99%3.03%2.84%2.73%0.00%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIMFX and WMRIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMRIX has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to GIMFX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMFX dropped -25.87% vs WMRIX's -37.84%.

GIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIMFX and WMRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer