GILT vs. ARKF
GILT (Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd) is a stock, while ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) is Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. Over the past 5 years, GILT returned 6.65%/yr vs -5.06%/yr for ARKF. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GILT vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -18.31% return.
GILT
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- 1Y
- 138.10%
- 3Y*
- 37.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
ARKF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -18.31%
- 6M
- -21.31%
- 1Y
- -11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.06%
- 10Y*
- —
GILT vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 15.92% | 110.41% | 0.65% | 5.34% | -17.96% | 18.14% | -12.01% | -13.58% |
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -18.31% | 28.67% | 34.34% | 93.27% | -65.07% | -17.82% | 108.03% | 20.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILT and ARKF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2019 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILT vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank
GILT
ARKF
GILT vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GILT | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.97 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | -0.31 | +4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | -0.57 | +10.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GILT vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than ARKF's maximum drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and ARKF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILT | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -78.63% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.96% | -38.50% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.94% | -38.50% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.20% | -75.30% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.47% | -38.77% | -60.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.78% | -34.95% | -45.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.93% | 21.00% | -7.07% |
Volatility
GILT vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 25.22% compared to ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) at 10.36%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILT | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.22% | 10.36% | +14.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.23% | 25.14% | +35.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.60% | 33.69% | +37.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 42.87% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 39.77% | +8.02% |
Dividends
GILT vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison
GILT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.91% | 5.52% | 5.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILT and ARKF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILT has higher volatility (25.22%) compared to ARKF (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILT dropped -99.94% vs ARKF's -78.63%.
GILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILT and ARKF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer