GILD vs. CI
GILD (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) and CI (Cigna Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — GILD in Drug Manufacturers - General, CI in Healthcare Plans. Over the past 10 years, GILD returned 7.71%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for CI. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GILD vs. CI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than CI's 6.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed CI with an annualized return of 7.71%, while CI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.
GILD
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 20.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
CI
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
GILD vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 5.83% | 36.59% | 18.68% | -1.99% | 23.63% | 29.95% | -6.70% | 7.88% | -9.92% | 2.96% |
CI Cigna Corporation | 6.37% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILD and CI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 1992 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
GILD:
$161.97B
CI:
$76.43B
GILD:
$7.35
CI:
$23.59
GILD:
17.57
CI:
12.27
GILD:
0.04
CI:
0.71
GILD:
5.45
CI:
0.28
GILD:
6.89
CI:
1.81
GILD:
$29.74B
CI:
$277.94B
GILD:
$18.74B
CI:
$19.38B
GILD:
$12.88B
CI:
$10.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILD vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank
GILD
CI
GILD vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and Cigna Corporation (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILD | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | -0.18 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | -0.34 | +3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILD | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | -0.15 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.17 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.31 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.34 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
GILD vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, smaller than the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and CI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILD | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -84.34% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.65% | -26.54% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -32.10% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.59% | -32.10% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.47% | -42.47% | +12.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.63% | -18.21% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.16% | -18.82% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.13% | 14.51% | -7.38% |
Volatility
GILD vs. CI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) is 6.88%, while Cigna Corporation (CI) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that GILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILD | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 9.35% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.53% | 18.86% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.31% | 33.18% | -6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 28.43% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 30.75% | -5.27% |
Dividends
GILD vs. CI - Dividend Comparison
GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than CI's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 2.12% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.47% | 2.57% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 3.40% | 3.91% | 4.67% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.90% | 2.57% | 1.27% |
Financials
GILD vs. CI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Cigna Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GILD vs. CI - Profitability Comparison
GILD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GILD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
GILD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GILD and CI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CI has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to GILD (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILD dropped -70.83% vs CI's -84.34%.
GILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GILD and CI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer