GIL vs. RCI
GIL (Gildan Activewear Inc.) and RCI (Rogers Communications Inc.) are both stocks. GIL operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while RCI operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, GIL returned 9.52%/yr vs 3.75%/yr for RCI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIL vs. RCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than RCI's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, GIL has outperformed RCI with an annualized return of 9.52%, while RCI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.75% annualized return.
GIL
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 29.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
RCI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 44.93%
- 3Y*
- 0.09%
- 5Y*
- -2.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
GIL vs. RCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc. | -1.83% | 35.08% | 45.31% | 23.58% | -33.93% | 54.00% | -4.46% | -1.17% | -4.58% | 29.00% |
RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 4.12% | 28.55% | -31.89% | 3.37% | 1.59% | 5.64% | -2.99% | -0.19% | 3.94% | 37.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIL and RCI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 1998 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
GIL:
$11.25B
RCI:
$20.94B
GIL:
$1.54
RCI:
CA$12.89
GIL:
39.44
RCI:
4.18
GIL:
2.40
RCI:
1.41
GIL:
3.30
RCI:
1.62
GIL:
$4.09B
RCI:
CA$20.68B
GIL:
$1.18B
RCI:
CA$8.39B
GIL:
$631.40M
RCI:
CA$14.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIL vs. RCI — Risk / Return Rank
GIL
RCI
GIL vs. RCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIL | RCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 2.24 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 6.88 | -4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIL vs. RCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, roughly equal to the maximum RCI drawdown of -84.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and RCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIL | RCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.23% | -84.00% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.71% | -20.10% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.28% | -48.21% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -56.92% | +18.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.44% | -56.92% | -17.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.52% | -25.65% | +10.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -25.36% | +6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.70% | 6.54% | +4.16% |
Volatility
GIL vs. RCI - Volatility Comparison
Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a higher volatility of 10.74% compared to Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) at 6.07%. This indicates that GIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIL | RCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.74% | 6.07% | +4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.40% | 21.54% | +4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.65% | 26.23% | +8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.13% | 22.48% | +9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.61% | 23.05% | +11.56% |
Dividends
GIL vs. RCI - Dividend Comparison
GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than RCI's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc. | 1.56% | 1.45% | 1.74% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 1.53% | 0.55% | 1.82% | 1.48% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 0.91% |
RCI Rogers Communications Inc. | 3.76% | 3.81% | 4.74% | 3.14% | 3.27% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 3.03% | 3.08% | 3.77% | 4.98% | 5.57% |
Financials
GIL vs. RCI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Rogers Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIL vs. RCI - Profitability Comparison
GIL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.35M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
RCI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 821.73M and revenue of 3.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.
GIL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported an operating income of 59.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
RCI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 821.73M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.
GIL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a net income of -65.79M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -5.6%.
RCI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Communications Inc. reported a net income of 314.89M and revenue of 3.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIL and RCI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIL has higher volatility (10.74%) compared to RCI (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs RCI's -84.00%.
RCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIL and RCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer