PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCI vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RCI vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RCI having a -9.87% return and T slightly lower at -10.13%. Over the past 10 years, RCI has underperformed T with an annualized return of 1.39%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 1.81% annualized return.


RCI

1D
1.37%
1M
-13.43%
6M
-6.39%
YTD
-9.87%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
-5.51%
5Y*
-5.57%
10Y*
1.39%

T

1D
1.99%
1M
-7.39%
6M
-7.05%
YTD
-10.13%
1Y
-16.34%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCI vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RCI
Rogers Communications Inc.
-9.87%28.55%-31.89%3.37%1.59%5.64%-2.99%-0.19%3.94%37.47%
T
AT&T Inc.
-10.13%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RCI and T is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 1996

0.26

The correlation between RCI and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RCI:

$18.03B

T:

$149.84B

EPS

RCI:

CA$12.87

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

RCI:

3.68

T:

7.06

PEG Ratio

RCI:

0.04

T:

0.29

PS Ratio

RCI:

1.24

T:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

RCI:

CA$20.68B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RCI:

CA$8.39B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

RCI:

CA$14.25B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCI vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCI
RCI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCI vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.90

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

-0.57

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

-1.31

+1.78

RCI vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCI and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCI vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCI drawdown since its inception was -84.00%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCI and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.00%

-64.15%

-19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.79%

-28.89%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.21%

-28.89%

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.92%

-32.01%

-24.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.92%

-42.35%

-14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.64%

-24.17%

-11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.38%

-15.73%

-9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

12.52%

-4.76%

Volatility

RCI vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) is 8.76%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that RCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.76%

10.00%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.10%

19.81%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

23.52%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

24.36%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

23.90%

-0.74%

Dividends

RCI vs. T - Dividend Comparison

RCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than T's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCI
Rogers Communications Inc.
4.34%3.81%4.74%3.14%3.27%3.36%3.26%3.03%3.08%3.77%4.98%5.57%
T
AT&T Inc.
5.15%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

RCI vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rogers Communications Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
3.94B
33.47B
(RCI) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RCI values in CAD, T values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


RCI and T have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to RCI (8.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCI dropped -84.00% vs T's -64.15%.

RCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCI and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer