PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIL vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIL vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -12.32% return.


GIL

1D
1.81%
1M
6.91%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
1.32%
1Y
33.46%
3Y*
29.16%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
9.52%

GDXY

1D
2.43%
1M
-14.26%
YTD
-12.32%
6M
-11.68%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIL vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
-1.83%35.08%33.37%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.32%88.08%-11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GIL and GDXY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIL vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL
GIL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GILGDXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.65

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

1.83

+0.91

GIL vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIL vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -34.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and GDXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-34.16%

-53.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.71%

-34.16%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.52%

-29.61%

+14.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-6.72%

-12.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.70%

12.05%

-1.35%

Volatility

GIL vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) is 10.74%, while YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a volatility of 14.51%. This indicates that GIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.74%

14.51%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

32.60%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.65%

38.00%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.13%

32.36%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.61%

32.36%

+2.25%

Dividends

GIL vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than GDXY's 82.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
82.04%52.13%23.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
1.56%1.45%1.74%2.25%2.47%1.53%0.55%1.82%1.48%1.16%1.23%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIL and GDXY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXY has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to GIL (10.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs GDXY's -34.16%.

GIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIL and GDXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer